The practice of abbreviating Open Content License' as OPL' leads to confusion between them.
Read the rest of this entry Filed under Collection, Insects, Lista, Lists, Phthiraptera, Science and tagged administration, curator, Czech republic, Dicruridae, Elbel, manuscripts, Meliphagidae, Mey, Morphology, new species, Nitzsch, Paradisaeidae, Paramythiidae, Philopteroides, Philopterus, Phthiraptera, PIPeR, results, Salt Lake City Leave a comment Sep7 Posted.
Copyright (C) 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110, USA Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article is permitted in any medium without royalty provided this notice is preserved.
Version.0 of the apsl is a free software license.You might look at that as a problem for the developer; however, if you are sure you would want to cooperate with the users in those ways anyway, then it isn't a problem for you.Its normal use is for fonts, and in that use, the incompatibility does kvinna söker par not cause a problem.Its applicability is not limited to textual works books.Because of the incompatibility, we urge you not to use the AFL for programs you write; however, there is no reason to avoid running programs that have been released under this license.This license has the same disadvantages as the lgpl.Jahia Community Source License The Jahia Community Source License is not a free software license.(We don't think those patent license requirements are inherently a bad idea, but nonetheless they are incompatible with the GNU GPL.) Common Public License Version.0 This is a free software license but it is incompatible with the GPL.This is much like that of Guile.Licenses For Works Besides Software and Documentation GNU General Public License The GNU GPL can be used for general data which is not software, as long as one can determine what the definition of "source code" refers to in the particular case.If part of a program allows the GNU GPL as an alternate choice, or any other GPL-compatible license as an alternate choice, that part of the program has a GPL-compatible license.There is a revised version of the Artistic License (dubbed " Artistic License.0 which is a free software license, and even compatible with the GNU GPL.The following licenses do qualify as free software licenses, and are compatible with the.It has several serious problems: The patent license is voided by any modification, no matter how small, of the pertinent code.As a result, it is not a strong copyleft, and it is compatible with the GNU GPL.Apache License, Version.0 This is a simple, permissive non-copyleft free software license with practical problems like those of the original BSD license, including incompatibility with the GNU GPL.However, there is no reason not to use programs that have been released under the original BSD license.If you want a simple, permissive non-copyleft free software license, the modified BSD license is a reasonable choice.You can do this, legally, if you are the copyright holder for the program.FSF is in active negotations with the Perl Foundation regarding the license, and we look forward to a result which will benefit all users.Translations hitta gratis kv of this page, various Licenses and Comments about Them.
More explanation is available.